Credibility Reviews: Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment

This site went on line November 21, 2008

Jump down to start of reviews











April 16, 2010

This credibility review system was established in November 2008 to counter the large amount of nonsensical, unsupportable, undocumented claims posted on the Internet about the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment. Such material seriously hinders bona fide efforts to get this crime exposed to the public, and ultimately stopped.

Such nonsensical material means journalists are reluctant to "touch" this issue. Such nonsensical material makes officials reluctant to offer genuine support to targets asking for help. Bogus material is not a trivial issue.

Credibility reviews, posted here, are intended to help those who are not familiar with the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment, or are targets who may be new or have limited awareness of literature relating to this crime.

Information Handling Tips, a free, not copyrighted booklet giving tips on how to best dicusss with other targets, or present the organized stalking/electronic harassment issue to the non-target public.

The reviewers' opinions are their own personal opinions. Those who post reviews here have been chosen because they have had some years' experience with OS/EH literature, some education and experience relative to the topic of the items reviewed, and have demonstrated a strong interest in separating the best information from that which is bogus, or at least questionable.

An "OK" rating doesn't necessarily mean the item is perfect, rather, it means the reviewer considers the item of sufficient quality that it can be used to educate the public and officials about the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment (OS/EH). Comments posted here relate to usefulness for public education.
A "LOOKS OK" rating is a "provisional" rating, meaning the reviewer does not find serious flaws on the face of it. For example, the writer of an item relates a personal experience, but the reviewer hasn't personally investigated (or hired a detective to do so) the story told by the writer, or, the reviewer hasn't been able to exhaustively research the item, but it is an item likely to come to the attention of journalists. Journalists can use this rating as a "promising lead," but before accepting it as fact, should do an appropriate independent check. (Reviewers can assist journalists or officials wanting further information if requested.)
An "OPINION ONLY" rating means the item, even though it may appeal to targets on the basis of it "sounds right" to them, has substantial claims not backed up by mainstream documentation. Examples are the testimony of John St. Clair Akwei, and the documents circulating on the Internet written by alleged former NSA agent "William Filer." Journalists should give these items credibility appropriate to personal opinion only.
An "OFF TOPIC" item may have excellent information, well documented, but has, in the reviewer's opinion, too much information not related to organized stalking and electronic harassment. While there are many urgent issues facing the world today, excessive information about them can tire the viewer/reader/listener, making them less likely to absorb the message that OS/EH needs everyone's attention.
A "DISTRACTS" item may have valid information, but the information is presented in a frantic matter, with huge fonts, heavy colours, literally screaming at the viewer/reader/listener. I, Eleanor White, used this frantic style in years past, and activist Norma Cross showed me that her toned-down, matter of fact style, in normal font sizes, with subdued colours, was the way to go. Her site, http://www.randomcollection.info/catchcanada, using a calm, collected style has actually played a part in convincing hostile family members and doctors.
A "NEEDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION" item can be a claim made by an individual which, due to the reviewer being unable to travel or do the necessary research, would require someone professionally qualified, other than the person making the claim, to investigate before an "OK" review could be applied. Because the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment is bizarre in and of itself, some "far out" claims are made on targets' web sites. Such claims could be picked up on by journalists or officials as evidence that the crime of OS/EH is not believable. This makes the "needs independent verification" rating important.
A "NOT OS/EH RELEVANT" rating means the item, even though it may be perfectly accurate, does not apply to the actual experiences reported by targets of organized stalking and electronic harassment. A good example are devices which can produce electronic assault effects, but require direct contact with the body. EH targets experience assaults through walls, in the wilderness, and places where direct contact with devices isn't possible. Therefore articles on direct contact devices are "not OS/EH relevant."
A "BAD FOR ACTIVISM" rating can mean that bogus materials are included in the item, the item is too long, the item is too shrill, too much off topic or distracting information is included, that too much of the OS/EH story is included for FIRST CONTACT material, and/or any part of the material doesn't use best communications practice. An item of information can be all true but still bad for activism.
A "BOGUS" rating means there is at least one serious flaw in the item reviewed. It means the reviewer advises against referring to the item for activism purposes. There may be good information in the item, but the bogus portion is too serious for the item to represent the fight against organized stalking and electronic harassment to the public, in the opinion of the reviewer.
A "DISCUSSION REQUIRED" rating means that the reviewer believes there may be a chance that further discussion with the information poster may produce a more favourable rating. It means that problems have been identified, and those specific problems need further discussion.

Reviewers are usually OS/EH targets who have done activism to expose and stop organized stalking and electronic harassment, and are not "top experts," however, they review items where their combined education and experience make their viewpoints worth considering carefully. Reviewers don't volunteer to review items where their education and experience are lacking in relevance.

The reviewed items registry below provides:

A reviewed item posted with the "Credibility OK" icon without a review identification number should be considered as NOT REVIEWED by this system.

A reviewed item which has been changed since the review copy was taken should be considered as NOT REVIEWED by this system.

LIST OF REVIEWED ITEMS:

ALL organized stalking/electronic harassment sites
Reviewer's comment sheet

The Shocking Menace of Satellite Surveillance by John Fleming
000_001: Review dated Nov 21/08

Web site: http://www.gangstalkingworld.com, author unknown
000_002: Review dated Nov 21/08
Web site: http://www.targetedindividuals.com, author unknown
000_002: Review dated May 18/10

Web site: http://www.randomcollection.info/catchcanada, by Norma Cross
000_003: Review dated Nov 22/08

Book: Controlling the Human Mind, by Dr. Nick Begich
000_004: Screen shot of reviewed item dated Nov 22/08
000_004: Reviewer's comment sheet

Book: Cause Stalking, by David Lawson
000_005: Screen shot of reviewed item dated Nov 23/08
000_005: Reviewer's comment sheet

Article in journal "American Psychologist", by Dr. Don Justesen,
title "Microwaves and Behavior", describing the successful transmission
of pulsed microwave voice to skull
000_006: Screen shot of reviewed item dated Nov 24/08
000_006: Reviewer's comment sheet

AP Article: To some psychiatric patients, life seems like TV,
by Jennifer Peltz, Associated Press writer, November 25, 2008
000_007: Review dated Nov 25/08

Involuntary implantee David Larson's web site, and original
report on his involuntary implantation
000_008: Review dated Nov 26/07
000_008: Original Larson report

HAARP Article: Washington's New World Order Weapons Have
the Ability to Trigger Climate Change
, by Michel Chossudovsky,
globalresearch.ca (Canadian news web site)
000_009: Review dated Nov 26/08

Web page: John St. Clair Akwei vs.NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA,
a submission made by John Akwei to federal court complaining about
mainly "mind control", which is part of electronic harassment
000_010: Review dated Nov 26/08

Web page: Science page, Christians Against Mental Slavery,
webmaster John Allman, contributor John McMurtrey, MS
000_011: Review dated Nov 27/08

Web site: Stop Covert War, webmastered by
Sueann Campbell
000_012: Review dated Nov 27/08

Web site: Mind Justice, authored by Cheryl Welsh,
focussing mainly on the involuntary human experimentation
and mind control aspects of organized stalking and electronic
harassment.
000_013: Review dated Nov 27/08

Book 1996, by novelist Gloria Naylor
000_014: Review dated Nov 27/08


Web site: exoticwarfare.org
000_015: Review dated Nov 28/08

Web site: http://www.surveillanceissues.com
000_016: Review dated Nov 29/08

Article: HAARP is a mass-murder weapon, bogus by reason
of the headline implication that HAARP has directly murdered
people with its signal. HAARP may have geophysical weapons
potential, but it has not directly caused death by its signal.
000_017: Review dated Nov 30/08

Web site: http://americancognitivelibertiesassoc.org
000_018: Review dated Nov 30/08

Web site: http://www.us-government-torture.com
000_019: Review dated Nov 30/08

Web sites: Various, do a web search on the terms
"Marshall Thomas" MONARCH ...to locate them
000_020: Review dated Nov 30/08

Blog entry at: http://iamatorturevictim.blogspot.com
000_021: Review dated Dec 1/08

Web site: http://www.organizedcrimewaves.com
000_022: Review dated Dec 4/08

Web site: http://www.hosnyinfo.com/can_you_prove_it
000_023: Review dated Dec 4/08

Web site: http://www.planetdeusex.com/ ... /sonic_weapons.html
000_024: Review dated Dec 4/08

Web site: http://www.bugsweeps.com,
the site of electronic detective Roger Tolces
000_025: Review dated Dec 4/08

Web article: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59988/pg1,
the famous "2020 Neural Chip" article
000_026: Review dated Dec 4/08

MASS EMAILINGS
000_027: Review dated Dec 6/08

Document: NSA Mind Control and Psyops by "Will Filer"
000_028: Review dated Dec 10/08


Web Posting: PDF page which may be from a book
titled "HAARP: Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy" by
Jerry E. Smith
000_029: Review dated Dec 11/08

Report: U.S. Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights,
by Professor Peter Phillips et al, Sonoma State University
000_030: Review dated Dec 11/08

Report: Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons,
furnished to Donald Friedman in 2006 as a result of his
U.S. Freedom of Information Act request
000_031: Review dated Dec 12/08

Article: Microwave ray gun controls crowds with noise,
(MEDUSA project,) David Hambling, New Scientist ezine
000_032: Review dated Dec 12/08

Court Document: "MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT"
by the U.S. Secret Service
000_033: Review dated Dec 12/08

Article: What's Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires?,
an article posted by ABC News, by Lauren Cox
000_034: Review dated Dec 13/08

Web Site: http://www.psychologicalharassment.com, a
web site which falsely implies that organized stalking and
electronic harassment causes "psychiatric difficulties",
and stresses suicide, which happens, but only rarely among
OS/EH targets. No mention of the accurate term "CRIME."
000_035: Review dated Dec 18/08

Article: Domestic Torture via Radiation Weaponry:
America's Horrific Shame
, by Vic Livingston,
as posted on the infowars.com web site, December 30, 2008
000_036: Review dated Dec 30/08

Report: Stalking Victimization in the United States
000_037: Review dated Jan 17/09

Report: The Extent & Nature of Stalking: findings from
the 1998 British Crime Survey
, Home Office Research Study 210
000_038: Review dated Jan 19/09

E-book: Bridging the Gap, an e-book written about a
crime called "gang" stalking, which is better called organized
stalking and electronic harassment
000_039: Review dated Jan 31/09

Product: The Flanagan Neurophone
000_040: Review dated Feb 12/09

Site & book title: http://www.satweapons.com, Book title:
A NEW BREED - SATELLITE TERRORISM IN AMERICA by Dr. John Hall
000_041: Review dated Apr 16/10

Product: LRAD, Long Range Acoustic Device, made by
American Technologies Corp. of San Diego, California
000_042: Review dated Feb 15/09

Article: Man jailed after harassing elderly neighbours by
whistling Addams Family theme each time he saw them

000_043: Review dated Feb 21/09

Book: My Life Changed Forever by Elizabeth Sullivan
000_044: Review dated Mar 8/09

Web pages: Organized Stalking Statistics as
posted on sites owned by Eleanor White
000_045: Review dated Mar 9/09

Activism materials: POISON PILL items
000_046: Review dated Mar 13/09

Technology: "RADIONICS" or "PSYCHOTRONICS" or "ORGONE"
000_047: Review dated Mar 22/09

Web site: http://www.freedomfightersforamerica.com
000_048: Review dated Apr 16, 2009

SCALAR WAVES UPDATE This item is a brief article providing the visitor with the credibility status and what to say or not say about "scalar waves" when discussing OS/EH advanced technology. The article will be updated as new information becomes available.

NEURO-IMAGING UPDATE This item is a brief article providing the visitor with the credibility status and what to say or not say about neuro-imaging, essentially the same thing as "remote neural monitoring (RNM)" when discussing OS/EH advanced technology. The article will be updated as new information becomes available.

Most recent visits only:

counter to blogger

View Visit Stats for This Page